Chemical Plants ‘Effectively Unregulated:’ Report

Wednesday, July 30, 2014 @ 07:07 PM gHale

Whether the government is playing politics or they are getting serious about security, there is now a movement to strengthen security for chemical plants.

That is because the government continues to underestimate the threat of a chemical attack on America’s densely populated cities and has failed to inspect virtually all of the chemical facilities it considers particularly vulnerable to terrorists, congressional investigators said.

RELATED STORIES
CFATS Bill Passes House
West, TX, Blast First Responders Unprepared
CFATS Bill in Works
Oil Pipeline Bursts in LA County

The yearlong investigation by Republican staff on the Senate Homeland Security Committee paints a portrait of inspection delays, government errors in risk assessment and industry loopholes in a $595 million terror prevention program passed by Congress in 2006.

Coming a year after a massive explosion at a West, Texas, fertilizer plant, the report points to threats from the release of toxic and flammable chemicals.

Half of the 4,011 high-risk facilities on the Homeland Security Department watch list are in 10 states: California, Texas, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, Florida, Michigan and New Jersey.

Committee investigators said larger metropolitan regions such as Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and Philadelphia might be more vulnerable to a chemical attack. The report notes that rural accidents like the West, Texas, plant explosion “pale in comparison with the consequences of releasing large quantities of toxic gas into a densely populated city.”

The U.S. effort is “a broken program that is not making us measurably safer against the threat of a terrorist attack,” states the report commissioned by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK.

It said widespread problems have left many of the nation’s riskiest chemical facilities “effectively unregulated.”

“Today — eight years later — there is little, if any, evidence to show that the more than half a billion dollars DHS has spent created an effective chemical security regulatory program,” Coburn said.

The report relies in part on internal DHS documents, including a terror program assessment completed late last year not released, and a federal database of higher-risk facilities restricted to the public.

Republican members shared the study with the committee’s Democratic chairman, Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware, who concurred with the main findings.

Acting swiftly to address problems in the program, the Senate committee on Wednesday approved legislation to give the Department of Homeland Security more funding stability to step up its monitoring and set guidelines for chemical facilities to undertake some security measures. Currently, funding for the program ends up authorized by Congress from year to year.

The legislation, which now goes to the full Senate, would authorize money for the program over a four-year period. It would also allow some of the lower-risk chemical facilities in the anti-terror program to self-certify it had met DHS guidelines as the department worked to reduce inspection backlogs for those it considered to be at the highest risk of a chemical terrorist attack.

“These facilities, and the chemicals they hold, could pose significant risks to our communities if they were exploited by those who seek to do us harm,” Carper said. He added the legislation “should go a long way in making it better and more efficient.”

DHS spokesman S.Y. Lee said the department has stepped up monitoring efforts, having approved security plans for 750 facilities in the last two years. DHS officials have called on Congress to authorize the program over multiple years so the government and chemical companies can better plan for longer-range security.

“The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program is an important part of our nation’s counterterrorism efforts,” Lee said, adding that DHS is committed “to build on the progress it has made.”

The report said that as of June 30, DHS had failed to conduct security compliance inspections on 3,972 chemical facilities, or 99 percent of the 4,011 facilities initially considered at a higher risk for terrorism. Many of these facilities are chemical manufacturers; they also include farm supply retailers or fertilizer distribution warehouses.

DHS considers a chemical facility “higher risk” based on the amount of toxic or flammable chemicals on site, such as chlorine, a corrosive, or ammonium nitrate, which can be used to make explosives.

Final rankings, on a tier of one to four, end up based on additional information provided to the government.

The committee found that roughly 3,111 of the facilities had yet to have security plans approved despite statements to DHS officials they would be done. Investigators said it could take years for DHS to reduce the backlog.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.