Macaroni Maker Faces Safety Fines

Thursday, February 6, 2014 @ 04:02 PM gHale


Philadelphia Macaroni is facing $75,483 in fines for 13 workplace safety and health violations — five of them repeat — at its Warminster, PA, facility, said officials at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

The penalties come after a July 2013 inspection initiated under its Site-Specific Targeting Program that directs enforcement resources to workplaces with the highest injury and illness rates. Philadelphia Macaroni has 37 workers at this facility.

RELATED STORIES
Amputation Hazards at Auto Parts Maker
Wire Maker Faces Repeat Safety Fines
Iron Foundry Fatality Brings Safety Fines
Safety Fines for Metal Stamping Plant

“The Site-Specific Targeting Program allows us to be proactive in identifying workplace hazards before an accident can occur,” said Jean Kulp, director of OSHA’s Allentown Area Office. “Each of the cited violations leaves Philadelphia Macaroni workers open to risks and needs to be fixed immediately.”

The repeat violations, with a $60,490 penalty, were due to electrical hazards, including the improper use of electrical equipment, blocked electrical panels and an opening in electric boxes, cabinets and fittings; a deficient emergency eyewash system; and use of an improperly configured guard designed to protect workers from lacerations while working with a band saw.

The company faced similar citations in November 2008. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously received a citation for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years.

Eight serious violations, carrying a $14,993 penalty, include deficiencies in the company’s program for controlling hazardous energy and electrical hazards. These hazards include exposed live parts operating above 50 volts and the use of a damaged flexible cord.

A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.