NRC to Issue New Safety Rules

Monday, March 5, 2012 @ 03:03 PM gHale

As the first anniversary of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster approaches, U.S. nuclear regulators feel they have learned from the past and will now issue new rules to deal with safety raised by the world’s worst nuclear accident in 25 years.

On March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami overwhelmed the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant on Japan’s northeast coast, knocking out critical power supplies that resulted in a nuclear meltdown and the release of radiation.

Blizzard of ’78 Cause of Nuke Cracks
Ohio Nuke Safe Despite Cracks
NRC Safety Enforcement Questioned
Nuke Alert: Human Error in Leak

Three members of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) voted late last week to issue the first of three proposed rules recommended by the agency staff, although the commissioners differ on some details.

The staff said its recommendations, based on eight changes identified by the NRC’s Fukushima task force, could move forward without significant delay, with implementation by the end of 2016.

Reactor design modifications and operating changes based on lessons from Fukushima should add millions of dollars in costs for nuclear operators, including Exelon Corp., Entergy Corp., Southern Co. and others.

NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko and commissioners William Magwood and George Apostolakis approved issuance of the proposed orders, but only Jaczko said all the changes should be mandatory and not subject to further cost-benefit analysis.

While the combination of events — an earthquake and tsunami — would be unlikely in the United States, “the events at Fukushima have reinforced that any nuclear accident with public health and safety or environmental consequences is inherently unacceptable to society,” Jaczko said in filed comments.

The NRC chairman also urged a speedier timeline for the industry to complete the re-evaluation of seismic risk for reactors in the central and eastern United States.

“I still strongly believe that all Fukushima-related enhancements should be complete within five years,” Jaczko said.

Magwood and Apostolakis repeated earlier opinions they need to see more analysis before they determine if Fukushima-related changes should be mandatory at all nuclear stations, regardless of cost.

Apostolakis said the proposed rule calling for additional spent-fuel pool instrumentation, while beneficial, should not be mandatory due to the low likelihood of a catastrophic event affecting spent fuel.
“If we are to remain a predictable, reliable and credible regulator, we must base our decisions — especially those as important as those before us today — on careful, sober, detailed technical analyses,” Magwood wrote.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.