Nuclear Plant Safety Varies by Region

Wednesday, October 16, 2013 @ 07:10 PM gHale


The number of safety violations at U.S. nuclear power plants varies dramatically from region to region, which could mean there is inconsistent enforcement, a new report said.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) figures cited in the Government Accountability Office report show while the West has the fewest reactors, it had the most lower-level violations from 2000 to 2012 — more than 2.5 times the Southeast’s rate per reactor.

RELATED STORIES
Leak in AZ Nuke; VA Unit Back Up
Corrosion Found at PA Nuke
PPL Nuke Safety Violations
Jellyfish Shut Down Nuke in Sweden

The Southeast, with the most reactors of the NRC’s four regions, had the fewest such violations, according to the report, a copy of which The Associated Press obtained.

The variations do not appear to reflect real differences in reactor performance. Instead, the report said, the differences suggest that regulators interpret rules and guidelines differently among regions, perhaps because lower-level violations get limited review.

The study also said the NRC’s West region may enforce the rules more aggressively and that common corporate ownership of multiple plants may help bolster maintenance in the Southeast.

However, the reasons aren’t fully understood because the NRC has never fully studied them, the report said. Right now, its authors wrote, the “NRC cannot ensure that oversight efforts are objective and consistent.”

The analysis was written by the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, at the request of four senators. Before the government shutdown, the report had been set for public release later this month.

The GAO analysis focuses on lower-level safety violations known as “nonescalated.” They represent 98 percent of all violations identified by the NRC, which regulates safety at the country’s commercial reactors.

Lower-level violations pose very low risk, such as improper upkeep of an electrical transformer or failure to analyze a problem with no impact on a system’s operation, such as the effect of a pipe break. Higher-level violations range from low to high safety significance, such as an improperly maintained electrical system that caused a fire and affected a plant’s ability to shut down safely.

The GAO’s analysis shows 3,225 of these violations from 2000 through the end of 2012 across 21 reactors in the West. By contrast, there were 1,885 such violations in the Southeast. Yet that region is home to 33 reactors, 12 more than in the West. The West registered 153.6 violations per reactor, while the Southeast saw just 57.1.

The Midwest, with 24 reactors, had 3,148 violations, for a rate of 131.2 per reactor. The 26-reactor Northeast also fared worse than the Southeast, with 2,518 violations, or 96.8 per reactor.

The Cooper nuclear station in Brownville, Nebraska, led all sites in lower-level violations per reactor with 363. The next four were Wolf Creek, in Burlington, Kansas, with 266; Kewaunee, in Kewaunee, Wisconsin, 256; Perry, in Perry, Ohio, 256; and River Bend, in St. Francisville, Louisiana, 240.

The GAO found less regional variation in higher-level safety violations. The five plants with the most higher-level violations per reactor from 2000 to 2012 were Davis-Besse in Oak Harbor, Ohio, with 14; Kewaunee, nine; Perry, eight; Palisades, in Covert, Michigan, eight; and Fort Calhoun, in Fort Calhoun, Nebraska, eight.

In its official response to the report, the NRC defended the objectivity of its plant assessments. At the same time, it acknowledged the regional differences and promised to look deeper into why they happen.

According to the GAO, the NRC regulatory staff also offered several explanations, including regional variations in reactor ages and time spent on inspections.

The GAO analyzed data for 104 commercial reactors, but four permanently shut earlier this year: Crystal River in Florida, Kewaunee, and the two units at San Onofre in California.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.