PPL Shuts PA Reactor for Blade Inspection

Wednesday, May 18, 2011 @ 01:05 PM gHale


PPL Corp. will shut down its 1,149-megawatt Unit 1 at the Susquehanna nuclear power station in Salem Township, PA, to inspect blades on the main turbine after it found defects on similar blades in Unit 2.

The 1,140-MW Unit 2 has been down for refueling since April 5.

“As a precaution, we have decided to inspect the blades on the Unit 1 turbine after finding defects on similar blades in the Unit 2 turbine during a routine inspection,” said Timothy Rausch, PPL’s chief nuclear officer.

“Unit 1 will be returned to service when the inspection and any needed turbine blade replacements are completed,” Rausch said.

The unit was operating at 33 percent power, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said in a report.

During a shut down in Unit 2, staffers found “indications of cracks” in some of the low-pressure turbine blades, so officials extended the outage to replace those blades, said PPL spokesman Joe Scopelliti.

“The turbine blade inspection is a normal part of our outage inspection, but we didn’t expect to find defects in the blades,” Scopelliti said.

Each of the two reactors at the plant heat water to the point where it converts into steam, which then carries over to the turbine generators. Each generator has a shaft with a high-pressure turbine on one end attached to three low-pressure turbines, the last of which attaches to the generator shaft.

The blades of the turbines catch the steam and cause the shaft to spin at about 1,800 revolutions per minute, which enables the generator to create electricity.

Each turbine weighs about 170 tons and has hundreds of blades. Because defects were in a few blades, most or all will undergo inspection, Scopelliti said.

Every two years, the plant shuts down one of the reactors for about a month to replace about 40 percent of the fuel rods and perform other modifications and upgrades along with an inspection, he said.

Scopelliti said PPL is also upgrading the plant’s control system to a new digital system.

Unit 1 has other issues as the NRC notified PPL that Reactor One moved from the “regulatory response column,” which is the second lowest oversight level, to one level above — the “degraded cornerstone column.”

The higher level of oversight took effect “beginning in the first quarter of 2011,” the agency said.

In the five-column action matrix of NRC’s reactor oversight process, the degraded cornerstone column, or Column 3, goes to plants whose “cornerstone objectives [are] met with minimal reduction in safety margin,” according the NRC.

Column 1 plants require the least amount of agency oversight, while plants in Column 4, “multiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone,” receive the most NRC attention short of a mandated shutdown under the “unacceptable performance” criteria of Column 5.

NRC said Susquehanna-1 has had “greater than three unplanned” shutdowns per 7,000 hours when the reactor is critical, a condition the agency said has “crossed the Green-to-White threshold.”

Under the NRC reactor oversight process, an inspection finding gets a color indicating its safety significance. Findings with very low safety significance are “green,” while “white” findings have low to moderate safety significance.

The four unplanned shutdowns happened in 2010 on April 22, May 14, July 16 and on January 25, 2011. A steam leak was the cause of the most recent shutdown.

Susquehanna-1 will receive an “increase in the NRC’s inspection and assessment oversight” as a result of its elevation into Column 3, NRC said in the letter. Specifically, the agency said it will perform a supplemental inspection when the plant operator notifies NRC it is ready.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.