Posts Tagged ‘Google’
Thursday, April 16, 2015 @ 03:04 PM gHale
Chrome 42 for Windows, Mac and Linux is now up and running and this latest release fixes 45 security issues and removes NPAPI support, said Google officials.
The most serious vulnerability fixed in Chrome 42 is a cross-origin bypass flaw in the HTML parser (CVE-2015-1235). The discovery of this high severity bug earned an anonymous researcher $7,500.
The list of high severity vulnerabilities also includes a type confusion in V8 (CVE-2015-1242) reported by Cole Forrester of Onshape, a use-after-free in IPC (CVE-2015-1237) reported by Khalil Zhani, and an out-of-bounds write bug in the Skia graphics engine (CVE-2015-1238) identified by cloudfuzzer.
The medium severity security issues reported by external researchers are a cross-origin-bypass in the Blink web browser engine, an out-of-bounds read in WebGL, a use-after-free in PDFium, a tap-jacking flaw, an HSTS bypass in WebSockets, an out-of-bounds read in Blink, scheme issues in OpenSearch, and a SafeBrowsing bypass.
The researchers who contributed to making Chrome more secure gained $21,500, according to Google blog post.
“We would also like to thank all security researchers that worked with us during the development cycle to prevent security bugs from ever reaching the stable channel,” said Alex Mineer of the Google Chrome team.
In September 2013, Google said it would phase out support for the Netscape Plugin API (NPAPI). The company noted at the time the API’s 90s-era architecture was causing crashes, security issues and other problems.
In January 2014, Google blocked web page-instantiated NPAPI plugins by default, but whitelisted some of the most popular applications, such as Silverlight, Unity, Google Earth, Google Talk, and Facebook Video. Java was also on the list of most popular plugins using NPAPI, but it ended up disabled earlier for security reasons.
Now, NPAPI support is out by default in Chrome and extensions requiring NPAPI plugins will end up removed from the Chrome Web Store. Advanced users and enterprises can temporarily re-enable NPAPI until the plugins they use transition to alternative technologies.
Starting with Chrome 45, scheduled to release in September, this override will end up removed and NPAPI support will go away forever.
Monday, March 16, 2015 @ 03:03 PM gHale
Google fixed two serious vulnerabilities with the release of Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The flaws, which affect all Android versions prior to 5.1, ended up uncovered and reported by Guang Gong, a security researcher at the Chinese internet security company Qihoo 360.
One of the vulnerabilities (CVE-2015-1474) is an integer overflow that leads to heap corruption. The high-severity flaw, which has a CVSS base score of 10, allows a remote attacker to gain elevated privileges or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on the targeted system.
“Multiple integer overflows in the GraphicBuffer::unflatten function in platform/frameworks/native/libs/ui/GraphicBuffer.cpp in Android through 5.0 allow attackers to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via vectors that trigger a large number of file descriptors or integer values,” Gong said in an advisory.
The second vulnerability (CVE-2015-1530) can also end up exploited for privilege escalation or DoS. The flaw is the result of an integer overflow in the Android media package.
“An Integer overflow in the BnAudioPolicyService::onTransact function in frameworks/av/media/libmedia/IAudioPolicyService.cpp in Android through 5.0 allows attackers to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via vectors that trigger a large number of count value,” the advisory said.
Gong said malicious applications can exploit these vulnerabilities to surreptitiously carry out various tasks, including taking photos of the user and uploading them to a remote server, making phone calls, and sending messages.
Gong reported the vulnerabilities to Google in October and November 2014. In the case of CVE-2015-1474, the search giant had to release two patches because the first one was incomplete.
Google released Android 5.1 last Monday. The latest update introduces a new feature called Device Protection, which ensures lost or stolen devices remain locked until the owner signs in with their Google account.
Thursday, March 5, 2015 @ 01:03 PM gHale
Google’s latest version of its browser, Chrome 41, brings new apps and extension APIs, stability and performance improvements, and, of course, security fixes.
Fifty-one security issues ended up fixed in Chrome 41.0.2272.76, including 13 high-severity and six medium-severity vulnerabilities identified by external researchers.
Anonymous researchers earned $14,500 for identifying an out-of bounds write flaw in media (CVE-2015-1212), a use-after-free in v8 bindings (CVE-2015-1216), and a type confusion in v8 bindings (CVE-2015-1217).
The researcher who uses the online moniker Cloudfuzzer reported three out-of-bounds write vulnerabilities in skia filters (CVE-2015-1213, CVE-2015-1214, CVE-2015-1215), a use-after-free in DOM (CVE-2015-1218), and an out-of-bounds read in PDFium. Cloudfuzzer earned $19,000 for his work.
The list of high-severity vulnerabilities also includes an integer overflow in WebGL (CVE-2015-1219) reported by Chen Zhang of the NSFOCUS Security Team, use-after-free flaws in web databases and service workers (CVE-2015-1221, CVE-2015-1222) reported by Collin Payne, a use-after-free in the gif decoder (CVE-2015-1220) found by Aki Helin of OUSPG, a use-after-free in DOM (CVE-2015-1223) identified by Maksymillian Motyl, and a type confusion issue in v8 (CVE-2015-1230) reported by Skylined.
Medium-severity issues include an out-of-bounds read in vpxdecoder, a validation issue in the debugger, an uninitialized value in the Blink rendering engine, an uninitialized value in rendering, and a cookie injection via proxies.
Several vulnerabilities also ended up discovered by the Chrome Security Team.
So far, Google paid out $50,000 to those who contributed to making Chrome 41 more secure.
Google decided to turn the single-day Pwnium competition into a year-round program. Researchers who find a Pwnium-style bug chain in Chrome or Chrome OS and report it through the Chrome Vulnerability Reward Program (VRP) can get up to $50,000.
Thursday, January 15, 2015 @ 06:01 PM gHale
Google released details of a new privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows just as Microsoft was getting ready to send out a patch.
The issue is the vulnerability first came to Microsoft’s attention over 90 days ago and Google’s Project Zero automatically released the details when the Redmond software giant did not release a patch within the 90-day disclosure deadline.
“When a user logs into a computer the User Profile Service is used to create certain directories and mount the user hives (as a normal user account cannot do so),” Google said in its report. “In theory the only thing which needs to be done under a privileged account (other than loading the hives) is creating the base profile directory. This should be secure because c:\users requires administrator privileges to create. The configuration of the profile location is in HKLM so that can’t be influenced.”
“However, there seems to be a bug in the way it handles impersonation, the first few resources in the profile get created under the user’s token, but this changes to impersonating Local System part of the way through. Any resources created while impersonating Local System might be exploitable to elevate privilege. Note that this occurs every time the user logs in to their account, it isn’t something that only happens during the initial provisioning of the local profile,” Google said.
A proof-of-concept (PoC) demonstrating the attack on Windows 8.1 published, but researchers said the vulnerability also affects Windows 7.
In November, Microsoft informed Google of plans to address the issue in February 2015 and asked for an extension of the deadline. However, Google told Microsoft the 90 day deadline is “fixed for all vendors and bug classes and so cannot be extended.” Later, Microsoft promised to address the vulnerability in January, but Google still refused to extend its deadline even by two days.
In late December, Project Zero published the details and a proof-of-concept for a different Windows 8.1 privilege escalation flaw after the 90-day deadline expired.
Friday, August 29, 2014 @ 02:08 PM gHale
Thinking security while creating software is a must that more designers need to consider these days because not going that route is a recipe for disaster. Just ask Target.
That is why security researchers from Cigital, Google, Twitter, HP, McAfee, EMC, RSA, Harvard University, George Washington University, Athens University of Economics and Business, the Sandosky Foundation, and the University of Washington joined up with the IEEE Center for Secure Design and published a report looking at 10 of the most common software security design flaws.
IEEE Computer Society Center for Secure Design Participants are, Iván Arce, Sadosky Foundation; Neil Daswani, Twitter; Jim DelGrosso, Cigital; Danny Dhillon, RSA; Christoph Kern, Google; Tadayoshi Kohno, University of Washington; Carl Landwehr, George Washington University; Gary McGraw, Cigital; Brook Schoenfield, McAfee, Part of Intel Security Group; Margo Seltzer, Harvard University; Diomidis Spinellis, Athens University of Economics and Business; Izar Tarandach, EMC, and Jacob West, HP.
The organizations came up with a top 10 list during a workshop session this spring, where each brought examples of design flaws it had experienced.
So far the security industry targets finding and eradicating security vulnerabilities. But design flaws, such as using encryption incorrectly or not validating data properly, can also end up exploited by attackers or lead to security bugs. As a matter of fact, these issues could be more difficult to eradicate as they built in. That is one reason why software designers need to think about security as they create the software.
Target’s data breach ended up being a design flaw leading to a hack.
The report recommends how to prevent each of the 10 most common software security design flaws:
1. Earn or give, but never assume, trust.
2. Use an authentication mechanism that cannot end up bypassed or tampered with.
3. Authorize after you authenticate.
4. Strictly separate data and control instructions, and never process control instructions received from untrusted sources.
5. Define an approach that ensures all data end up explicitly validated.
6. Use cryptography correctly.
7. Identify sensitive data and how you should handle it.
8. Always consider the users.
9. Understand how integrating external components changes your attack surface.
10. Be flexible when considering future changes to objects and actors.
Click here to view the full report.
Friday, August 15, 2014 @ 03:08 PM gHale
Google rolled out version 36 of the Chrome browser for Windows, Mac and Linux, including a set of security fixes, along with the latest revision of Flash Player.
Twelve vulnerabilities ended up fixed in this release, with some found by external security researchers, who earned cash for their efforts through Google’s bug bounty program.
For a use-after-free security flaw (CVE-2014-3165) in web sockets, Google paid $2,000 to researcher Collin Payne; additional information about this flaw is not available right now.
From another external researcher, the Google team received details about a security glitch that could lead to information disclosure in SPDY. Identified as CVE-2014-3166, the discovery goes to Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, second year PhD student in team Prosecco at Inria Paris.
In order to prevent the information leakage, Chrome developers decided to disable SPDY and QUIC session pooling in the latest revision of the web browser.
SPDY is a network protocol designed to increase page load speed and security, by manipulating HTTP traffic.
Disabling it translates to the user into slower page loads on websites using this protocol, but the latency is not as significant as to affect browsing at all.
Additional input came from the internal security team, who discovered an undisclosed number of glitches through internal audits or code fuzzing operations.
Build 36.0.1985.143 of the web browser also updates the Adobe Flash Player plug-in to the recently released version 188.8.131.52.
Adobe patched seven critical vulnerabilities, most of them referring to memory leaks that could end up taken advantage of for bypassing memory protection mechanisms (address randomization).
Thursday, May 15, 2014 @ 01:05 PM gHale
Bad guys are looking to steal Google account passwords via a new and well-written phishing attack that is hard to catch with traditional heuristic detection, researchers said.
The way Google Chrome displays data: URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers) makes Chrome users most vulnerable, however the phishing attack also targets Mozilla Firefox users, said researchers at security provider Bitdefender.
“With access to users’ Google accounts, hackers can buy apps on Google Play, hijack Google+ accounts and access confidential Google Drive documents,” said Catalin Cosoi, chief security strategist at Bitdefender. “The scam starts with an email allegedly sent by Google, with “Mail Notice” or “New Lockout Notice” as a subject.”
“This is a reminder that your email account will be locked out in 24 hours,” the email said. “Due to not being able to increase your Email storage Quota. Go to the INSTANT INCREASE to increase your Email storage automatically.”
When clicking the INSTANT INCREASE link, users end up redirected to a Google login web page that imitates the authentic one and asks for their credentials.
“What is interesting about this phishing attack is that users end up having the ‘data:’ in their browser’s address bar, which indicates the use of a data URI scheme,” Cosoi said.
The data URI scheme allows scammers to include data in-line in web pages as if they were external resources. The scheme uses Base64 encoding to represent file contents, in this case supplying the content of the fake web page in an encoded string within the data URI.
As Google Chrome doesn’t show the whole string, regular users have a hard time figuring out they are the target of a phishing attack and may give their data to cyber-criminals.
Scammers usually pose as services that contact people by email for announcements or notifications. Google, Facebook, eBay, phone services and financial institutions are among phishers’ favorite disguises to invade inboxes worldwide.