VA Hazardous Waste Violations Upheld

Monday, February 23, 2015 @ 03:02 PM gHale

Chem-Solv, Inc. and Austin Holdings-VA, L.L.C., the operator and owner of a chemical blending and distribution facility in Roanoke, VA, must pay a $612,338.78 fine for hazardous waste violations, said the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Appeals Board (EAB).

In a January 26, Final Decision and Order, the EAB upheld in its entirety the 2014 Initial Decision made by a EPA Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), and ordered respondents to pay the full civil penalty.

RELATED STORIES
DuPont Gas Leak Design Issues
DuPont Fined for Air Pollution in NJ
Oil Tanks Leak Gas
Chemical Plant Fined for Releases

Chem-Solv, Inc., the operator of a chemical distribution facility located at 1111 and 1140 Industry Ave. in Roanoke, and Austin Holdings-VA, L.L.C., the facility owner, handles and distributes various chemicals, including alcohols, acids, caustics, mineral oils, surfactants, glycols and solvents.

“EPA takes seriously our obligation to protect people’s health and safeguard communities by assuring compliance with the nation’s environmental laws,” said EPA Regional Administrator Shawn M. Garvin. “This final decision and order affirms the due diligence we took in pursuing an enforcement action to address hazardous waste violations that put the public’s health and environment at risk.”

EPA’s complaint cited violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the federal law governing the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA’s goal is to protect public health and the environment, and avoid costly cleanups, by requiring the safe, environmentally-sound storage and disposal of hazardous waste. The RCRA requirements mandate the use of safe practices which greatly reduce the chances that hazardous waste will release into the environment.

In its 2014 appeal, Chem-Solv raised four issues questioning the ALJ’s determination that: (1) the company impermissibly operated a hazardous waste storage tank regulated under RCRA; (2) a leaking chemical drum contained a solid waste rather than a useful product; (3) the company had failed to make required hazardous waste determinations for materials in the storage tank and for certain aerosol paint cans; and (4) whether the ALJ demonstrated bias against the Chem-Solv in the underlying decision.

In its January 26, Final Decision and Order, the EAB found the ALJ’s Initial Decision “supported by a preponderance of the evidence” and Chem-Solv’s allegations the ALJ exhibited bias were “without merit.” The EAB found “no evidence of bias in the record” and noted how the ALJ’s Initial Decision “thoroughly explain[ed] why she found each witness’ testimony credible or not, and cited to other facts in the record upon which she relied in reaching her decision.”

The EAB ordered full payment of the civil penalty within 30 days and let stand the ALJ’s original compliance order requiring the company to comply with applicable RCRA hazardous waste tank closure requirements.

Respondents have the right to appeal the EAB’s Final Decision and Order to federal district court.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.