Nuke Fuel Research a Must

Thursday, March 8, 2012 @ 04:03 PM gHale

One year after the crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, scientists and engineers remain in the dark when it comes to fundamental knowledge about how nuclear fuels behave under extreme conditions.

That is why there is now a call for an ambitious, long-term national research program to study how nuclear fuels behave under the extreme conditions during core-melt events like those that occurred at Fukushima following the March 11, 2011, magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami, said University of Michigan nuclear waste expert, Rodney Ewing.

NRC to Issue New Safety Rules
NRC Eyes Response to Fukushima
Japan to Install Reactor Vent System
Japan Crisis: Nuke Data Backup Unplugged
Japan Nuke Cleanup: 40 Years

Three of the plant’s six boiling-water reactors suffered partial core-melt events that involved tremendously high temperatures and powerful radiation fields, as well as interaction between seawater and nuclear fuel. Tons of seawater cooled the overheated reactors and nearby spent-fuel storage ponds, and direct discharge of contaminated seawater to the ocean and groundwater occurred through April 8.

“What I realized while watching all of this was how little we actually knew about what happens if you take hot seawater and pour it on nuclear fuel,” said Ewing, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, the Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, and the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Ewing is also a member of the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.

“No one, as far as I know, had asked the question, ‘Well, what happens when you do this? Are we doing something really good or really bad?'” Ewing said. “That kind of information really wasn’t available, and that expertise, as far as I could see, wasn’t there to be called upon.”

The use of seawater at Fukushima underscores the need for fundamental nuclear-fuel knowledge that can apply over a range of unanticipated situations, Ewing said. The research should include studies of the various radioactive materials released from damaged fuel during a core-melt incident, as well as a thorough examination of how nuclear fuel interacts with fresh water and seawater, he said.

Such studies could lead to predictive models that would help nuclear plant operators respond to unforeseen events, taking appropriate and timely action to minimize impacts on the environment and human health.

“Almost by definition, an accident will be something that puts you in a situation that you didn’t anticipate,” said Ewing, Edward H. Kraus Distinguished University Professor. “So the research focus should be on the situations you don’t expect to deal with. Right now, that kind of knowledge is fragmentary, at best.”

On March 11, 2011, the three operational Fukushima reactors shut down promptly after the earthquake. Most of the fuel in the reactors was uranium dioxide.

When the tsunami inundated the site about 40 minutes after the earthquake, electrical power was lost, followed by the loss of onsite backup power, resulting in a station blackout and the loss of reactor coolant. A partial core-melt event ensued in units 1, 2 and 3.

The Japanese operator, TEPCO, said there was a nearly immediate loss of core cooling in unit 1, and almost all of its fuel assemblies melted and accumulated in the bottom of the pressure vessel. Partial melting of the cores in units 2 and 3, damaging one-third of the fuel assemblies in each, occurred over the following days.

Reaction of the zirconium alloy fuel cladding with water at high temperatures generated hydrogen gas that accumulated and exploded in four of the reactor units. The release of radioactivity, other than gaseous and volatile fission products, ended up dominated by the tons of seawater used to cool the cores and storage pools.
Ewing said despite all the uncertainties and unknowns about the short- and long-term effects using seawater to cool the Fukushima reactors was probably the right call.

“You have a crisis, you have to cool the cores, and you can’t afford to wait around,” he said. “Using the seawater sounds like the right thing to do.”

During the nuclear crisis that followed last year’s earthquake and tsunami, 80,000 or more people evacuated from the area nearest the Fukushima plant; a year later, they remain displaced. The Japanese government is awarding an initial $13 billion in contracts to begin decontamination and rehabilitation of the more than 8,000-square-mile region most exposed to radioactive fallout.

All but two of Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors remain shut down a year later, in a country where nuclear power once supplied nearly 30 percent of the electricity.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.